Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Diffrence In Ascot And Cravats

why governments are so inept in managing the risks?

To read about the Senate website: "REPORTS OF THE JOINT MISSION INFORMATION ON THE EFFECTS OF THE STORM Xynthia" which, Wednesday, June 16 proceeded to Hearing François Ewald, Professor Chair of Insurance National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts, director of the National School of Insurance :
Why governments are so clumsy in risk management?

"François Ewald. - We gargarisons the precautionary principle, an instrument both brief and effective risk management, but have little culture preparation, highly developed U.S. .
In 1982, the reality of natural disasters was unclear. The assurance was also one of the elect, who had previously go to Paris to beg for relief in case of disaster! With the 1982 Act, the risk has been transferred to insurers . Today, information is bloated: companies turn to specialized agencies for information on natural disasters. Why did the administration does not dispose of these services? It is true that this is sensitive information, confidential. Similarly, the law of 2002 excluded certain Kouchner medical information commerce social or economic. But the administration summarily manages situations that could be more finely - knowing that a differentiated information about each plot is more difficult to manage, where the precautionary principle reduced margins of error! Choose the appropriate conduct is out of all or nothing ... "

0 comments:

Post a Comment