While awaiting results of the discussion of Monday, June 14, 2010 ("Management Pandemic: H1N1, and if it again? "), it is helpful to read the LL (" Position Paper ") prepared by the HCFDC (French High Committee for Civil Defence ) on "management of the crisis of pandemic influenza in the business and the recent report with the state."
.
We learn that firms have be reactive, that they have benefited Event to test their business continuity plans (BCP), to update them and especially to measure the usefulness .
However, companies have a "mixed feelings" about the state management of the pandemic and in particular criticized the state a deficit of "readability" and "communication" : Excerpts:
.
"Faced with a device perceived as inappropriate and often misunderstood , both in the population, as in company management, managing this crisis has generated misunderstandings and questions facing strategic communication deficient state and the "unsaid" on certain measures outlined in the (lack of visibility and criteria on taken or not taken decisions).
"Faced with a device perceived as inappropriate and often misunderstood , both in the population, as in company management, managing this crisis has generated misunderstandings and questions facing strategic communication deficient state and the "unsaid" on certain measures outlined in the (lack of visibility and criteria on taken or not taken decisions).
"contributors to this report think the weakness of strategic communication and planning with civil society are the major reasons for difficulties in managing this crisis " latent ", yet strongly prepared by the state. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment